The operator problem
Most teams do not need another generic template.
They need to know whether this specific dispute is worth fighting, what proof exists, what is missing, and how to package the response clearly.
Primary use cases
Prepare evidence by dispute type, not by template.
A Product Not Received case should not be treated like a fraud case. The workflow changes the evidence plan, scoring, and packet narrative based on the actual claim.
Physical goods disputes
For physical goods merchants, the response should start with a clear view of the order, delivery, and customer communication records.
Unauthorized purchase claims
For fraud-related disputes, the system helps organize the available order, payment, and customer-history context before a response is drafted.
Know when not to submit yet
Some cases are not ready. SmartChargeback flags missing proof before you send a weak packet, so operators know whether to gather more evidence, submit now, or accept the loss.
Contact + privacy
Have a dispute to review? Start with an initial case assessment.
Send the dispute notice, order details, or related materials. We’ll review the case context first and let you know whether it makes sense to prepare a response.
Redacted materials are welcome
Customer names, emails, addresses, order IDs, payment IDs, and tracking numbers can be masked first. We do not need merchant dashboard access or login credentials for an initial review.
Good reasons to reach out
Helpful context: reason, amount, deadline, order type, and a redacted screenshot of the notice.
Help merchants decide
what is worth fighting.
Start with one real dispute. Redact sensitive details, review the case strength, identify missing proof, and prepare the response only when it is worth the effort.
Contact us